WWW.FILETHIRTEEN.COM
Pages Designed By:
All contents of www.filethirteen.com are the property of the webmaster and the author of filethirteen.com and cannot be reproduced, copied, distributed, quoted or in any other way used without our written consent. For more details please e-mail us at  lodger@filethirteen.com  Links to the site are appreciated and do not require permission. Informing us of your link to our site may result in gratitude and heartfelt thanks.
 

 

 

The Green Mile (1999)

3 Hours long. Why? Just because James Cameron can make an interesting and compelling 3 hour film doesn't mean everyone else can. Frank Darabont comes close but ultimately is defeated by his film's never-ending ending and Stephen King's source material.

Why does anyone think King can write honest, realistic, intriguing fiction? Okay, he occassionally succeeds. But usually in the short form. Here, he has a 6 book serial to draw from so the film, like, I assume, the books, goes all over the place. The film finds every nook and cranny and hidden corner of the story. It drags every little emotive moment out with 20 minutes of exposition to get there. Sometimes it works but overall, the film seems elongated and laborious.

The film concerns a death row prison guard and his band of co-workers and the inmates who come into their realm. When a rather large and simple black man arrives to exist in their midst, they are first weary of his presence. But as (a long) time progresses, they learn to see him for what he is, which is, basically, a walking, talking miracle worker.

Darabont wrings out every single emotional and heartfelt moment he can from the source. And, by God, the film, when it gets to it's climax, is a fucking powerhouse. It will make you crumble. It goes deep for the meaning and emotion and hits exactly at the perfect spot. It's a truly beautiful and angelic moment even if it takes us two hours and 40 minutes to get there. What makes it seem so weak is the final wrap- up, a 15 minute epilogue that goes nowhere. Darabont gets to the end easily enough. We don't really need an extraneous and somewhat tacked on ending that simple reiterates the film's message to no end rendering it almost null and void.

The acting in the film is superlative. Tom Hanks makes every single Goddamn moment count. He works his ass of for this film, like almost every film he is in, and makes the whole thing continually come to life. It's great. David Morse is equally great here. Morse's stoic and more reflexive character plays great off of Hanks emotive yet restrained leader. The two work great together, just like Hanks and Tom Sizemore in "Saving Private Ryan." (In many subtle ways, this film reminds us of the prior Hank's vehicle, especially the running time, the bookends of modern day juxtaposed against a body of pre-50's American life flashback, a group of men struggling against odds for a greater good...) Barry Pepper (who was in "Saving Private Ryan") redeems himself in the final reel here, after a rather lame performance, with a teary-eyed presentation that lets him react in our place on screen. Finally, at the film's end, he is us. And Michael Jeter, almost unrecognizable as a French Canadian inmate named Eduard Delacriox, acts as quite an impetus for the explosion in the realm of the imaginative that the film becomes. Jeter, always spectacular, is more so here for his character's fine flourishes that lack any hammy or overwrought moments.

Of course, the true giant of acting in the film is Michael Clarke Duncan. Formerly used only for his immense stature as a token "immovable force" in many films where he played a bouncer, Duncan brings such a wonderful pathos to his character, John Coffey, that we cannot help but come under his spell. Even when the film flashes to his supposed crime which lands him on death row, we can see that Coffey is an obvious innocent. So, stuck in King's sophomoric and over- used cliche of a "big, dumb innocent," Duncan, with pure acting skill, makes the character one of the most memorable and truly inspiring of the decade. The scene between he and Patricia Clarkson, using Darabont's poetic dialogue to it's fullest, is one of the most wonderful and emotional moments to come from Hollywood in I don't know how long. At times, Duncan makes the film enter the realm of masterpiece. And, of course, Hanks plays off of him like the acting genius that he has become. There are just a lot of moments where Hanks and Duncan and Morse simply carry the whole large, cumbersome film on their shoulders and raise it high into the cinematic heavens with their Herculean efforts.

Of course, there is always someone right around the corner to drag it down. Surely one of the most shallow, unimaginative and irritating characters in the film, if not in film history, is Doug Hutchison as Percy, a truly uninspired and Kingian character of a sadist if there ever was one. The whole use of Percy as the villain is pathetic. It drags what could be a wonderful film down into the depths of the unimaginable. Surely King, the master of suspense and horror, could give us a reason why Percy is so demented and sad. Darabont doesn't. He seems to be there only because "evil exists." And even more revolting is the homosexual/homophobic slant placed upon Percy and the whole film when Sam Rockwell comes into the plot as a wild and violent incarcerated criminal. Often, their scenes together, continually peppered with the use of the disenchanting word "faggot," will make your stomach turn. This is puerile, simplistic and stupid scripting and I put all of the blame for it on King and Darabont. It's inexcusable.

Darabont also falls into the trap of Kingian special effects that just don't work. Duncan has several scenes where black splotches, somewhat fly-like, gush out of his open mouth. In this marvellous age of Industrial Light and Magic, it still looks like a cheap, tacky, unbelievable Hollywood effect. This coupled with the use of lightbulbs as symbols of "life" and "enlightenment" and "magic" is enough to turn anyone off.

"The Green Mile" could be a fine film if all the Stephen King trappings were removed from it, like straight jackets, and insane asylums, and one-dimensional villains. And instead it focused on the magic, the purity and the joy of the story. There's enough here for a very solid movie. Yes, I understand that the evil has to exist for us to appreciate the goodness. What I want is better, more believable, less typical ideas of evil. We live in a modern age of cinematic marvels. To ask for a villain worthy of the hero is not asking too much. The lack of this makes "The Green Mile" a wasted masterpiece and the work of all the actors involved is cheapened by this one gigantic flaw. It's bigger than John Coffey himself.

Notes:

Also with Bonnie Hunt, James Cromwell, Graham Greene, Harry Dean Stanton, William Sadler, Gary Sinese, and Dabbs Greer.

Score by Thomas Newman.

Report Card

Script: B-

Acting: A-

Cinematography\Lighting: C

Special Effects\Make Up:
D-

Music:
A

Final Grade: B-

 
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z