Calendar of Events Whipping Post Reviews Events Coverage Film Maker Interviews Links Notes from Austin Lodgers Favorite Film Makers FILETHIRTEEN.COM
 

Dear Pillow (2004)

Edgy, dark, troubling, perplexing. Words that might very well describe Brian Poyser's "Dear Pillow" might also easily define the reality of teenage sexuality. In a cinematic world where teenagers get drunk and go wild ("Eurotrip," "The Real Cancun") or engage in numerous ways to defrock themselves of their virginity (a million other films), "Dear Pillow" is one of the few films that is so grounded in reality that watching it is comparable to the shock of a bucket of cold water in the face.

The film works for two key reasons. First, the script is phenomenal, like nothing we have ever seen or heard in movies before. And secondly, lead actor Rusty Kelley, who plays teenager Wes, is a revelation. Combined with these winning elements is solid acting support from a smart and talented supporting cast and Poyser's script's ability to shock yet never seem forced or fictitious when it counts and "Dear Pillow" becomes a compact thesis on modern sexuality. And in doing so, it also remains unlike any film you will ever see.

The script and the film (much of which was improvised) takes chances at every turn. Sometimes witty, sometimes amusing but just as often frank, sorrowful, complex and angst-ridden, the piece allows us to enter the world of teenage sexuality almost as voyeurs. Wes is our portal and Kelley injects perfect pitch reactions and ideals into the character. His look is perfect, the boy next door of the new millennium. Neither conventionally beautiful nor unattractive, Kelley is indeed the embodiment of teenage contradictions: Shy yet bold, detached yet intrigued, virginal yet sexual, cynical yet hopeful, wise yet ignorant, assured yet inexperienced, verbal yet inarticulate. Kelley draws us into the film because, ultimately, he makes us care about the character. We see ourselves in him. We see the future in him. While his eyes at first seem to reflect a vapid nothingness they are soon filled with
mirrors, reflecting our former teenage selves and all the confusion, frustration and vulnerability that this implies.

Here's a perfect example of why the film is amazing and Kelley is perfect within it. After the young writer Wes that Kelley portrays discovers that his older, probably gay neighbor, Dusty, writes pornography, he accepts the man's invitation to his apartment for a beer. After waiting to take a few sips and gather his thoughts (we think he is going to ask the man for help writing dirty stories), he becomes indignant and accusatory. "I think you're a sick fuck," he tells Dusty, rising to storm out the door. This film not only goes in direction we never expect it to go, it also does so by being honest, free and daring. Wes reaction here, fueled, as we will learn, by his confusion, shame and embarrassment, is exactly the reaction that would occur if the film were reality. There is example after example of this kind of realism in the film. With Wes, Dusty, and a couple of other secondary characters, Poyser
creates a fascinating story that continually goes least where we expect it. Indeed, it is our cinematic expectations that are belied here, not reality. There is not one false idea here, not one cliche, not one script-writing convention. Not when it counts anyway. Poyser proves himself not just adept as storyteller but also creative, calculating and bold.

Albeit expectations were less as the film was marketed (at the 2004 SXSW Film Festival where I experienced it) as a teen sex romp. The story is suggested to be about a 17 year old boy who gets a job writing pornography. The tagline on the promotional postcard says, "Try to think of something that makes your dick hard." And while I appreciate the marketing ideas to sell this film and even concur that they are wise, these really do nothing to promote the film for the truly exceptional work that it is. The titillating set-up to the film and the sexually explicit dialogue it contains may evoke some laughter here and there but the film slowly and skillfully winds tighter and tighter as it unspools to create more and more dramatic tension. Ultimately the film implodes from this tension and yet even in this only manages to tangle even more, winding still even tighter. This is a film that spirals, not out of
control, but deeper and deeper and tighter and tighter (God, no pun intended) until it finds Wes is a spring and the contraction of his inexperienced sexual psyche seems destine to explode into all directions.

Poyser creates a world of constant sexual flux in "Dear Pillow," exposing the dark underbelly of modern American sexuality. His film is built upon the expectations reflected in pornography and the sexual fantasies that the medium explores (i.e. a teenage boy's brain) yet relentlessly and almost tragically it instead exposes a world in which such fantasies cannot possibly exist. Wes has something to learn that we, as adults, all must learn in our own time, in our own way, and in our own personal situations. While Wes struggles to find his place in the adult sexual world (his 18th birthday is a part of the film's plot), we continue to be reminded that in finding that place we never arrive at what was expected or intended. In Poyser's cinematic world, a true reflection of our own, we are forced to accepting that sexuality is never easy, that sex is never as simple as it seems in pornography or our fantasies, and that nothing is what it appears to be. Dark, complex, perplexing and continually under pressure, the sexual subconscious of "Dear Pillow" exposes only frustration and confusion yet does so not in haeavy-handed morality based ideals but in new, unique and engrossing ways.

This film is nothing less than a masterpiece. As dark as any sexual thriller. As exhilarating as "Y tu mama tambien." As valid as real life.

Notes:

Also with Gary Chason, Viviane Vives (who is also a producer), Cory Criswell and John Erler.

Produced, photographed and edited by Jacob Vaughn.

Recognizable (to me anyway) Austin film names in the credits include Alex Holdridge (who plays a small role), Kyle Henry, Justin Hennard, and David Zellner among others.

Recognizable Austin locales in the film include the Stephen F. Austin Intercontinental Hotel, The Alamo Drafthouse Downtown (bathroom), the , 2020 South Congress apartments, and Sugar's adult night club among others.

Filmed and projected on video. The film debuted at Slamdance 2004.

Viewed at the Alamo Drafthouse in March 2004 where it screened during SXSW where the Zellner Brothers' "The Virile Man" short was also screened.

Report Card

Script: A+

Acting: A

Cinematography\Lighting:
C-

Special Effects\Make Up:
C

Music:
A

Final Grade: A

And Help Support Filethirteen!

Get Your"Dear Pillow" Stuff...

Search:
Keywords:
In Association with Amazon.com

More of Lodger's reviews indexed alphabetically! Just click your favorite letter to go there.

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

HOME


All contents of www.filethirteen.com are the property of the webmaster and the author of filethirteen.com and cannot be reproduced, copied, distributed, quoted or in any other way used without our written consent. For more details please e-mail us at  lodger@filethirteen.com  Links to the site are appreciated and do not require permission. Informing us of your link to our site may result in gratitude and heartfelt thanks.