Calendar of Events Whipping Post Reviews Events Coverage Film Maker Interviews Links Notes from Austin Lodgers Favorite Film Makers FILETHIRTEEN.COM
 

Bad (1977) (a.k.a. Andy Warhol's Bad)

Andy Warhol's last feature film has a promising premise: An aging suburban housewife runs an electrolysis parlour and a "hit-woman" operation out of her home. But this film, which is falsely accused of being similar to a John Water's flick, never lives up to it's potential.

The main fault here lies within the script which was supposedly based on "tabloid" articles. Screenwriters Pat Hackett and George Abagnalo not only don't make us laugh, they don't give us anything interesting to watch either. This film plods along without anything substantial or interesting ever happening. It is hard to make such an interesting premise so banal but Hackett and Abagnalo succeed.

Jed Johnson, Warhol's then live-in love interest, directs the film with no flair and great indifference. With a script this weak a visually stunning style is necessary but Johnson, who had worked as Warhol's film editor up to this point, shows no discernable style here. Johnson later went on to become a successful interior designer, which is odd since this film is so visually uninteresting.

Warhol wanted desperately for his films to be accepted by mainstream Hollywood and never understood why his little underground pictures didn't lead to a Hollywood deal. Warhol apparently had little to do with the actual production but he must have spent a lot of money on it. This film looks much more "slickly" produced than any of Warhol's other films. The budget here is obviously much larger than on any other Warhol film and this may be it's biggest fault. The subject matter here calls for campy sloppiness not slick production. And where was Paul Morrissey at during this time? He had split from the Warhol entourage (His last movie with Warhol was "Dracula" in 1974). It's too bad he wasn't around. Morrissey is probably the only guy, besides Waters, whose visual style and free-form direction might have saved this film.

In front of the camera Carroll Baker (the ingenue some years earlier in the banned "Baby Doll") plays Hazel Aiken, the ring leader of the "hit women" squad. She lives in her dreary suburban house with her daughter-in-law Mary (Susan Tyrell) and Mary's baby. Tyrell is the only interesting character in the film. She plays a frumpy loser with pizzazz. Perry King plays L.T., Aiken's first male "hit-person" employee. He has a supposedly emotional scene where he is sent to kill an autistic boy and cannot complete his job but the scene rings hopelessly false, as his character would obviously have no problem making the hit in reality.

One-time "Chelsea Girl" Brigid Polk is humiliated in her role as a client who wants a dog killed. She burps and farts and lugs around 300 pounds of ugly fat only to be not funny.

See, apparently the scriptwriters thought that killing babies, dogs and autistic children were hilarious ideas for plot twists. They are not. Although the scene where a baby is thrown from a upstairs window and splats blood on a female by-passer at impact is funny, it is hardly acceptable humor. Killing a baby, even if it is funny, just can't be acceptable to any viewer, even the most jaded. And here it just isn't presented correctly to be accepted as "black humor" either. It is not presented as being disturbing at all. The scene where a dog is stabbed is the most distressing one in this film and it is so repugnant that one cannot even tolerate watching it. But make no mistake, this is not a compliment. This film wants desperately to be funny in a "John Waters" sort of way and never, ever succeeds. Not once. Waters could film a baby's murderer and make it campy and acceptable. Johnson is simply out of his league here.

Andy Warhol's "Bad" is a very bad film indeed. Not just because it is poorly acted, not just because it is poorly scripted, not even because it tries to make repugnant situations funny. No. This film is bad because it simply isn't humorous. When a comedy film has to show an infant's blood splattering on an unsuspecting person's face to get a single laugh something is very, very wrong.

Note:

Vivian Vance (Ethel of "I Love Lucy" fame) was approached to play the role of Hazel Aiken and apparently liked the script. However, she felt her audience could never accept her in the role and politely declined the offer.

Scripter Hackett was Warhol's redactor for "Interview" magazine and ghost wrote his book "A to B and Back Again" with "Interview" editor Bob Colecello. She also redacted and edited the "Andy Warhol Diaries," an extremely interesting and lengthy daily account of the pop artist's last years.

Tyrell would later go on to play the hilarious Ramona Ricketts in John Water's "Cry Baby." Waters, incidently, was friends with Warhol and the director would often visit Warhol's Factory and show his films.

Baker came back to America, from a self-imposed exile, to make the film.

Distributed by Roger Corman's New World Pictures.

Viewed on VHS in 1993.

Report Card

Script: F

Acting: C

Cinematography\Lighting:
D-

Special Effects\Make Up:
B

Music:
C

Final Grade: F

And Help Support Filethirteen!

Get Your"Bad" Stuff...

Search:
Keywords:
In Association with Amazon.com

More of Lodger's reviews indexed alphabetically! Just click your favorite letter to go there.

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

HOME


All contents of www.filethirteen.com are the property of the webmaster and the author of filethirteen.com and cannot be reproduced, copied, distributed, quoted or in any other way used without our written consent. For more details please e-mail us at  lodger@filethirteen.com  Links to the site are appreciated and do not require permission. Informing us of your link to our site may result in gratitude and heartfelt thanks.