|
#16
IN THIS ISSUE
The Vortex - "Dirty Money"
More Rich and Kelly stuff
Aljohns on Oltorf
"American Movie"
Miss Xanna Don't
Kevin Smith and I (heart) Video
Jim Bruno and "Beyond Words"
The Forum
The Cinemaker Co-Op
Rock Opera
The Vortex - "The Cabaret of Broken Dreams
Sunday was Halloween and time change. But I didn't know about
the time change till almost 6pm... well, 7pm. No wait... Anyway...
I was going to meet Kelly cause we were going to the Vortex
to see a play called "Dirty Money" and I was a little early
so I stopped at this burger joint to get a bite. I picked
up the Austin Chronicle, a little late this week, and begin
to thumb around. That's where I saw a blurb about the time
change and snapped that I was over an hour early for me and
Kelly's "date." So I drove around a bit, went and ate some
ice cream and then went to ABCD's, Austin's Best Compact Discs.
(It's not, by the way). Bought a Dinosaur Jr. CD and PiL's
"Happy?" CD.
Earlier in the day, Kelly had called to set up plans and
we talked for almost an hour on the phone. I found out he
used to book shows for local bands in Houston into a place
called the Abyss and other clubs while he was still in high
school. We talked about punk music, Straight Edge (a philosophy
of sorts where punks refuse to do drugs, drink or have sex
- never quite understood that one!) and about the movie "Another
State of Mind" which is one of my all time fave punk flicks.
Kell is just so damn multi-faceted.
Went and picked up Kell and he drove us to the Vortex. He's
really a cool guy and I joked about how it was a "date" and
stuff. He's not gay, of course, but he's very comfortable
around me and that makes it fun and joyous to be around him
(this week anyway).
Got to the Vortex and sat around a bit. It was kinda slow,
being Halloween and all, and for a while I thought it might
be a performance for 2 tonight but more people showed up as
it got closer to 8. Some of them were in costumes and stuff.
Kelly and I discussed his acting some as we waited for the
play to start and also the possibility of him working in a
film I am considering making. It's at a rather early point
now, still gelling in my head, but I have a part that he would
be awesome in, if he could delve into it. It's a possibility,
at least. We talked about sexuality in acting and in performing
and nudity and such. Ironically, there would be a small amount
of male nudity in the play we were about to see.
"Dirty Money" is a play set in the Eastern Block in the future,
in a time where prostitution is legalized and hookers are
called "Sexual Service Providers." To evoke drama, playwright
Lisa Peschel adds a conservative American woman who travels
to Europe to condemn prostitution into the plot. In America,
in the future, things are pretty much the same as they are
now, it seems, at least where prostitution is concerned.
The play had problems, but overall, I really enjoyed it.
The acting, though a bit amateur at times, was fun and lively.
The actors, perhaps because the house was so small, seemed
to relax and really get into the piece after a bit and the
play sprang to life as it progressed. There were some corny
parts and a few rough spots, but I still enjoyed myself. The
text of the play could be a tad ham-handed in spots but the
actors seemed to move past this with ease or simply make them
a part of the show. Elissa Michelle Linares, as the main character
Heike, was cute and spunky and vibrant without being obnoxious.
I actually cared about her plight and I cared what happened
to her within the confines of the plot. Cameron Schaefer was
giddy without being goofy as Bridget. Angie Ray had a hilarious
moment as Uta, a sort of futuristic Oprah. And Dan Waller
actually made us care for his rather bland Rudi. Heather Barfield,
like many in the cast, started a bit shakey but her American
hooker Christine became a wonderful character and she actually
had several humorous moments in the later parts of the play.
These actors brought forth what were the high spot of the
evening.
Perhaps the only problems with acting came from Jason Yau's
seeming inexperience. He, along with Ray, had the disadvantage
of being the only ethnic minorities in the play, so that it
was a bit obvious when they performed in multiple roles. Rays's
hooker and student were indistinguishable from her Uta. Still,
her overacting made her charming and fun. I found it very
easy to like her no matter what she did. Conversely, although
Yau was adorable and had a sweet and humorous moment as a
young serviceman, his male prostitute and flitty council member
left a lot to be desired and caused the piece to lag in parts.
The direction by John Steven Rodriguez seemed a bit slapdash
and awkward. There was far too much movement and pretentiousness
in the transitions. A "bed" was repeatedly pulled out and
pushed back under the stage when it seems a better and more
permanent arrangement could have been made for the prop with
some thought. The play popped back and forth in time, with
sometimes-interesting effects, but Rodriguez's direction seemed
incapable of rectifying this part of the staging. All in all,
there was to much "transitional" business going on and it
distracted from the fluidity of the performance.
A great effect, however, was a futuristic "machine" that
acted as a answering service, doorman and health tester. Using
cheap but effective means, Rodriguez made the idea of a futuristic
"appliance" work with seeming ease. It was a bit cheesy but
overall it added to the interest of the piece and reminded
us of the futuristic tone of the setting.
Peschel tries to create a multi-textured play with no clear
moral implications. Her ideas about the right and wrong of
prostitution seem modern and sensible. But she injects a bit
of realism and schmaltz into the final act that we see coming
a mile away. Still, her heroine, Heike, is a strong character
and, thanks in part to Linares, the play makes us think about
the implications of legalized prostitution and the many ideals
and conflicts this implies. Although a bit obvious in parts,
the text also conveys much thought onto a subject which leaves
many of us stymied. In the end, Peschel tries her best to
make no moral decisions for us. But her wavering between ideals
probably causes more confusion than provokes thought. And
her ending seems to make it easier for those with objections
to legalized prostitution to walk away feeling righteous about
their mores. In the final analysis, however, although this
should be a sort of "hotbed" issue judging by the play's demeanor,
it is actually fairly old hat. Kelly and I never once discussed
the theme of the piece after we watched it. It did not evoke
thought or debate betwixt us.
After the play, we hung out a bit and Kelly and I noticed
a little guy in a rather "gay" leather get-up. Kelly asked
me what I thought of him and I quipped that I doubted it was
a costume (for Halloween). We went outside and the little
guy came up to us, and introduced himself as the director,
John. He was extremely nice and as we talked, he introduced
us to several people in the cast and crew. Kelly talked to
him a bit about acting and he gave him several suggestions
on how to get into the "scene." (I'm sure he was jealous of
me being there with a cutie like Kell.) We talked to Waller
about his nude scene. I complimented Linares on her performance.
I had noticed a really cute, lanky, fey boy sulking around
in an Enoesque Glam rock costume (frilly jacket with no shirt
and leather pants, dark lipstick and rouge) and I was delighted
when he came into our circle. His name was Daniel and he is
an actor as well. We talked a bit. He is going to be in "Despair's
Book of Dreams and the Sometimes Radio," a new play by Kirk
Smith, at the Vortex in January. He was very nice and I left
hoping to see him on stage in the future.
We went back to Kell's and met up there with Rich and sat
around and BS'ed until about 3 am. A friend of theirs named
Eric came over too and he was cute and sweet and nice, but
rather quiet. He passed out pretty quickly. I showed Rich
some footage I had edited that we shot when Kelly came over
last week. Then Rich whipped out a tape that had some of his
early stuff on it. Bastard's early work is even good. The
first thing he showed us was the first piece he and Kelly
had ever made which was goofy and pointless. Kelly played
a sort of... "Mentally challenged" guy (not really a stretch
for him --- just kidding!) Still, I liked it. Then there was
a sort of long and silly piece about a guy in the park waiting
to meet a girl called "Timothy Gets Stood Up," I believe.
It was a little too long but kinda funny. The topper though,
was a piece Rich had entered into a contest a few years back
and won first place with. It was very smart and fresh and
creative. Obviously the work of a high school student, but
still quite well done. Called "The Ledge," it's the only piece
I've seen by him that had titles and "end credits" with music
and stuff. I really liked it. It was made when Rich had long
hair and a goatee and he looked so different. He's much cuter
now.
We talked for a long time and Kell goofed on us for hours
on end. He went into an elongated "mime" piece that was just
weird. Although Kelly is one of the most unusual people I
have ever met, and even though we don't see eye to eye on
all things, I'm just sort of crazy about him. He's never,
ever boring, that's for damn sure.
Went for lunch to a place called Aljohns
on Oltorf, a pizza place. It wasn't very good. It was expensive,
not very tasty and took forever. The girl behind the counter
was nice but a complete airhead.
As I was leaving, I saw a flyer on the wall
for a missing girl. She looked to be college aged. What was
weird was that it said, in big black bold letters on top,
"Vanished." Not "Missing" or "Reward" but "Vanished." This
was eerie.
Upcoming gigs for Miss Xanna Dont:
11/17 Antone's 11/29 The Forum (for ladies
only)
12/03 Gaby & Mo's
The Highway Department actually has a website
about the construction at http://www.i35austin.com
Went to see "The
Limey" at the Dobie and they had a trailer for "American
Movie" on the film. This documentary looks hilarious and
awesome. They had a preview of it at the Alamo last week or
so and I wish I would have went. Can't wait to see the thing.
For some reason, I thought the guy in the film (it's about
a guy in the Midwest who is trying to make a low budget film)
was kinda slow or something. He doesn't look very bright in
the poster. But the trailer proves that assumption wrong.
He's just a normal guy trying to make a movie. It looks awesome.
Whats up with all the long haired cuties cutting
their hair. Anthony Kedis is a fox either way. But why...
Ahh. changes... I think Wiley cut his hair too. There's a
new picture on his website that has him with short hair. He
looks awesome.
I was just driving around, listening to New
Radicals CD. Went to I (heart) video and rented "Clerks."
I have not seen any of the Kevin
Smith films (What! What kind of indie film website guru
do you think you are!?! I put my fucking trust in your opinions
and you've never even seen Goddamn "Clerks." Fuck you Lodger!)
I'm trying to see all 3 Smith films so I'm prepared for "Dogma."
It's not that I wasn't interested in seeing them. I just never
got around to it. Anyway, I was driving around thinking about
how much I liked "Crazy
in Alabama." And how I liked "The
Bone Collector." Haven't seen a movie I hated since the
AFF. Anyway, I'm starting to feel like Bill Harris. Remember
him? He was this redheaded weirdo who used to be on Showtime
all the time. And he tagged all his stuff... "Bill Harris
in Hollywood... We'll talk again." (Eventually, this became
a lie since I haven't seen him in eons.) Anyway, when Siskel
and Ebert left PBS in the 80's to do their own syndicated
show, they put Bill Harris and Rex Reed together for "Sneak
Previews" on PBS. Remember Rex Reed? He was a sniveling homosexual
film critic. (Okay, he was THE sniveling homosexual film critic!)
Imagine a bitter Paul Lynde and that's Rex Reed. So Reed would
hate EVERYTHING. And Harris LOVED everything. They were silly
together. Like snot and perfume. But I loved it. I miss that
show. It was sort of the epitome of the 80's. Anyway, I feel
like Bill Harris, all of a sudden, loving a film like "Crazy
in Alabama." I suppose it's a mess. But it's just so sweet
and kitsch. Only a foreigner, like Antonio Banderas, would
make a film that has the Civil Rights Movement and the Women's
Rights Movement as 60's kitsch. It's just awesome. It's so
Almodovar without being Almodovar. I love it. I'm right.
A Pun: Boy the links people will sometimes
go to to get laid.
Rage Against the Machine is live in the studio
on MTV. Excuse me Mr. Rage, but isn't MTV the machine?
An e-mail from Jim Bruno who is working
on a local film called "Beyond Words:"
We wrapped production and principal photography
in July, and you're probably wondering, "What's up with Beyond
Words!"?
Well... After crashing and burning following
production Bruno finally picked up the pieces and began posting
the film! It wasn't easy at first--there were hardware, software,
and wetware issues that had to be resolved (the most challenging
were the wetware issues, but I won't get into that).
In September, a 5-minute test clip was
cut from the very heart of the film--the scene in which Alvin
tries to get June to swear--and June tries to get Alvin to
read (tough one, eh?). The clip was shown at a meeting of
the Digital Storytellers Alliance here in Austin, and there
was a great deal of support for it. Post was finally underway!
Since then, a rough of the first seven
minutes was created and presented at the November meeting
of the D.S.A., and that too met with some very supportive
comments. My thinking was..."Just wait! We've hardly scratched
the surface of Austin's wacky underworld!"
A rough of the first 7 minutes can now
be seen online in the form of three black and white clips;
they're based on QuickTime 3.0 (or 4.0), and may take you
a while to download if you've got a 56K modem or less.
Still, my hope is that you'll have a chance
to see the clips and scribble a note or two in the Guestbook
that links off the movie pages.
All is going splendidly. My goal is to
have a rough cut completed by late winter/early spring. I
would love to have the project completed by mid- to late-Summer
in time for submission to any festival that might consider
digitally-based content. If there is enough support, we'll
look into doing a transfer to film in late Summer/early Fall.
Jessica, Renee, Becky, and Adriana are
all well, and Bruno is in the midst of scheming and dreaming
up new ventures and adventures. Stay tuned, I hope begin working
on episodic shorts early next year.
Warmest wishes,
Jim
jb@avfilms.com
p.s. The clips can be found at
http://www.avfilms.com/movies.htm The Guestbook is at
http://www.avfilms.com/guestbook/guestbook.html
A bookworm meets up with the librarian from
Hell... Only to discover a life "BEYOND WORDS!"
Learn more at http://www.avfilms.com
The Austin Gay and Lesbian Film Festival
continues to have special screenings now and then. They currently
seem to have films showing on Tuesdays, sometimes at the Dobie.
For more info click http://www.agliff.org
The Alamo Draft House should have a new winter
calendar out soon.
On Saturday, I worked all day. Came home
and goofed around. Looked for a Rockets or Spurs game on TV
but found none. Took a nap. About 45 minutes into it, Tim
called and we talked for a good long time. He's finally moved
to Austin with his g/f and I'm so glad he's here. He's going
to work with Rich and Kelly and me on some projects.
As I've said, I'm trying to do the Kevin
Smith fest before "Dogma." Look for reviews here soon. Already
watched "Clerks" and "Mallrats."
I'm in love with Jason Mewes. But more about that later. Returned
"Clerks" to I (heart) Video but someone else had "Chasing
Amy" out. I have to rent it before "Dogma."
Went to The Forum and dropped about $35. It
was a dreadful night, full of the worst that Austin's gay
bars has to offer until I met an awesome bartender named Sylvester.
I hate to describe people by race but it works, so... Sylvester
is black. And he's fun and cool and witty and lovable. He
just worked me slowly with his affable charm until I was having
a great time. There was some other asshole at the bar, who
said he used to work there. He told a weird story about someone
coming up to him looking for cocaine. He was just a dickhead.
The kind of putz that makes me hate gay bars. Even worse than
the fluttering queens. The Forum is full of so many typical
idiots. Maybe because it's a college town you get these young
men who turn into these ridiculous floating queens because
it's the first opportunity they've had to be free. That's
what kills me about gay guys. They have to just fly. I do
the same Goddamn thing. It's actually kind of revolting. Given
the opportunity to be relaxed, we queen out like big homos.
It's a weird, sad, frustrating thing. Really so goddamn unattractive.
Anyway. Sylvester was fun. The best bartender
I've had in Austin. Makes me not so upset about having to
go back to the Forum. Some of my new gay friends have suggested
that they will take me out on a tour of some of the gay bars
in Austin. I hope so. Somewhere out there is my bar. I feel
it calling.
Sunday - got up after noon and went to Arbor
7 to see "Breakfast
of Champions." Got home around 4:30 and called Tim. We
were going to a meeting of the Cinemaker Co-op that one of
the members of the group invited me to. These, of course,
are open meetings and I would encourage anyone who wants to
make films in Austin to go to the next one. What's great is
that lots of people bring film and show it and talk about
it. The interest of the Co-op seems to lie in 8mm and Super
8mm filmmaking. However, as I learned tonight. If you bring
video or 16mm they will allow you to show it at the meeting.
This is a invaluable service to Austin filmmakers. You get
an audience and an arena to show your work, even a work in
progress or just some footage.
We got there early and talked to some folks
who arrived right after us. These were some interesting college
aged guys and our conversation revolved around mainstream
filmmaking, discussing Cameron, George Lukas and the like.
It was great to just be in a room of strangers and discuss
film. A wonderful experience. Another guy there was a camera
guy who was actually working in the filmmaking field as a
profession.
The meeting starts with folks showing their
work. The first thing we saw was a silent reel (can't recall
if it was 8 or Super 8) shot recently here in Austin of a
conductor working outside. This was either Walter Thomas or
Thompson. Not sure. He is sort of an unusual conductor whose
work is of a multimedia nature. He conducts with several visual
hand cues. And herein lies the rub. The film was awesome,
no doubt about it. But I viewed it in the context of an opening
statement by a couple of guys in the group (including the
filmmaker) who explained Thompson's work. Had the film simply
been shown without a narrative introduction, I think, perhaps,
it's effectiveness might have been diminished somewhat. Viewed
in the context of knowing what I was seeing, the reel was
visually beautiful, perfectly paced, and had some wonderful,
seemingly accidental lighting flourishes that were breathtaking.
Had I seen it cold, the image of a man outdoors simply making
weird hand gestures might have seemed pointless and slightly
pretentious.
I found out later the filmmaker was Aaron
Valdez whose work I had seen (and not liked) on the opening
night of the Cinematexas. Valdez told us of some of his plans
for exhibiting the film with some other footage that seemed
quite interesting. I have heard several people praise Valdez's
talent and he seems quite possible of developing forth from
the promise of this praise.
The guy running the projector showed a couple
reels of some arial footage he had shot. It wasn't particularly
interesting, but it brought forth several ideas and inspired
commentary and discussion. Which leads me to this part of
the group: Much of the discussion is of a technical nature.
There was a lot of talk about film stock, development, cameras,
techniques of shooting, etc... Stuff I am not very interested
in. But the group had several members (and visitors) who were
interested in this arena. I thought this group might be a
bunch of filmmakers all only interested in making their own
work. But there were several "crew" (for lack of a better
word) type people who seemed genuinely interested in helping
others produce their films. This is awesome. The one thing
seemingly missing from the group was anyone simply interested
in "acting."
There was some footage of a bike decorating
contest show. 2 reels. It was shot rather poorly with hand-held
I thought. But again, this was raw, rough footage, not a finished
work. I wrote down these notes as I watched however, which
I hope will aid me in my filmmaking endeavors: "Quick, short
shots. Don't waste time. Don't waste film. Pace fast - a day
= 3 minutes." Although I am more interested in video than
film, per se, I will admit this. 8mm is a much more immediate
medium. While it isn't expensive, really, it isn't cheap.
To buy and develop a roll of film running about 3 mins is
around $15-$25. Assuming, of course, that you already have
the camera and equipment. You can rent a camera and equipment
from Cinemaker, however, as my friend Tim pointed out, they
sort of pushed this idea like Amway during the meeting. So,
when you shoot on 8, it's all about the moment. It's hard
to edit as this requires some equipment and patience. Shooting
it "in the camera" is surely the best route. However, this
requires a certain ability and intuition. In 8, there is no
going back. What you shoot is now. While video is immediate
because you shoot it and can see it right away, 8 is immediate
because it is all about "the moment." Like theater, there
is no going back, very little fixing. It's all about NOW.
And, of course, seeing that "now" in two weeks when you get
your film back.
Finally, there was a video shown of some footage
originally shot on 8mm. One piece of this, where a TV remote
control unit was used for interesting and humorous effect
was quite good. The overall footage bgan with some "artsy"
footage of a hand holding a light bulb. Although it was nothing
new, it was done well. For some reason, it held my interest.
There seemed to be a subtle eroticism to it. It did go on
a little too long. And later, on this same guys tape, was
some interesting color footage of the stained glass windows
in a church and some B&W stuff of a guy fondling a brick before
hanging out on the side of the highway. Again, this was just
footage, not someone pretending to present a "film." And it
was quite visually interesting.
After a bit, when the viewing was over, we
were all asked to introduce ourselves and tell what we were
interested in. I had sort of lambasted Cinemaker Co-op's opening
night at Cinematexas and many of the filmmakers, whose works
was shown that evening, were in attendance. For a bit, after
this, I felt that the group were trying to justify their existence
and their work to me. This was totally unnecessary. They,
and their work, have every right to exist, and to continue
as they are. Just as I have every right to comment upon it,
report upon it and, even, become a part of it. All in all,
I truly enjoyed my visit to the Co-op and plan to attend more
meetings in the future. Assuming, of course, that since the
meetings are open to the public, they will have me.
Upcoming Cinemaker Co-op events include "Angels
and Insects" this Saturday 11/13 at the Artplex (1705 Guadalupe).
There will be refreshments and some presentation of some 1
minute short films. There is also a Super 8 workshop on Sun
11/14 from noon-4pm. Cost is $50 for non members. Finally,
the Co-op is allowing entries for their winter "showcase,"
"Tiny Prophecies," until 11/19/99. There will be a presentation
of selected entries in early December. There is a link to
the Cinemaker Co-op page on the links page and you can also
call them at (512) 236-8877 for details about all this stuff.
Answering machines are important in the way
that God is important. You think that you need one, but actually
it just means more annoyance, more responsibility and more
time away from the things you'd really like to do.
Notes from Bob Ray, the filmmaker responsible
for "Rock
Opera:"
Beth Sams, the super bad ass web designer,
has given the Rock Opera web site a facelift. The site now
contains killer new graphics, a link to the Rock Opera trailer,
up to date journal entries, more photos, a mailing list and
a merchandise page.
So check it out: http://crashcam.home.texas.net/
We now have over 5000 hits! So hooray
for us and many thanks to Beth·
Rock Opera CD Release Party That's right
folks, the long awaited Rock Opera CD will be available on
December 4th, just in time for X-mas (it's the perfect stocking
stuffer). The CD will feature a ton of Austin bands including:
Fuckemos, Ed Hall, Cherubs, Butthole Surfers, The Titz, The
Crack Pipes, El Flaco, Antebellum, Horseshit Gunfire, Pong,
El Insecto, PigPoke, Witchbanger, Squat Thrust, Honky, Tallboy
and more.
The CD Release Party will take place at
the Red Eyed Fly on December 4th and will feature: Honky,
Fuckemos, Pocket FishRmen, Voltage, and The Titz.
The CD will be available for purchase
at the release party, in local record stores, or you can buy
direct from the web site: http://lonestar.texas.net/~crashcam
Rock Opera to play at the San Francisco
Independent Film Festival (January 6-14) West coast, here
we come. We're bringing our nasty Texas-style rock and roll
picture show to San Fran this January for the San Francisco
Independent Film Festival (January 6-14). Director Bob Ray
and the star of Rock Opera, Jerry Clark, will try to drag
their sorry carcasses out to the fest (pending the cash required
for travel).
If any of y'all live in S.F. or know of
anyone who'll help out the cause by spreading Rock Opera propaganda
in the area, please drop me a line at crashcam@texas.net.
We'd love to get some fliers and stickers out and about in
the bay area.
The Vortex is repeating "The Cabaret of Broken
Dreams" on Sunday night. For more info see Notes
from Austin #12...
Lots of cool stuff going on now and happening
soon in Austin... Look for more news about "The Vortex," The
Alamo Draft House's Winter season, Cinemaker Co-op, Rich and
Kelly, AFS' "Pigs Pimps and Pornographers," AGLIFF screenings,
and Kevin Smith's "Dogma..." soon on filethirteen...
|